CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6] — Page 287

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Mistrin, 10th June 1856.

My dear Sir John,

I have just received your letter on the subject of the unpleasant difference between the Judge and Mr. Anstey.

You will not love a moment in telling you that I agreed with the Chief Justice when he first mentioned to me that a public apology was due to him and this I now know was the opinion of his other friends, but when...

His Excellency Sir John Bowring.

JAN BARRO DEL AR (likely incorrect OCR, should be "JÁN BARRÓ DEL ÁR" or more likely "JOHN BOWRING")

becomes

His Excellency Sir John Bowring.

The final output in HTML:

Mistrin, 10th June 1856.

My dear Sir John,

I have just received your letter on the subject of the unpleasant difference between the Judge and Mr. Anstey.

You will not lose a moment in telling you that I agreed with the Chief Justice when he first mentioned to me that a public apology was due to him and this I now know was the opinion of his other friends, but when...

His Excellency Sir John Bowring.

Edit History

2026-05-18 03:11:52 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Mistrin, 10th June 1856. My dear Sir John, I have just received your letter on the subject of the unpleasant difference between the Judge and Mr. Anstey. You will not love a moment in telling you that I agreed with the Chief Justice when he first mentioned to me that a public apology was due to him and this I now know was the opinion of his other friends, but when... His Excellency Sir John Bowring. JAN BARRO DEL AR (likely incorrect OCR, should be "JÁN BARRÓ DEL ÁR" or more likely "JOHN BOWRING") becomes His Excellency Sir John Bowring. The final output in HTML: Mistrin, 10th June 1856. My dear Sir John, I have just received your letter on the subject of the unpleasant difference between the Judge and Mr. Anstey. You will not lose a moment in telling you that I agreed with the Chief Justice when he first mentioned to me that a public apology was due to him and this I now know was the opinion of his other friends, but when... His Excellency Sir John Bowring.
Baseline (Original)
(Copy) 7. 2851 Mistrin, 10th June 1856. My dear Sir John, I have letter on the cubject of the unpleasant just recived your difference between the Judge and W-Anstey. You I love not a moment in telling to that I agreed with the cutze when he first mentioned the me that a public apology subject was due to him and this I now was the opinion of his other friends, but when His kneelleney Sir John Moring. JÁN BARRÓ DEL ÁR
2026-05-18 03:11:52 · Baseline
View content

(Copy)

7.

2851

Mistrin, 10th June 1856.

My dear Sir John,

I have

letter on the cubject of the unpleasant

just recived

your

difference

between the Judge and

W-Anstey.

You

I love not a moment in telling

to

that I agreed with the cutze when he first mentioned the me that a public apology

subject

was due

to him and this I now was the

opinion of his other friends, but when

His kneelleney

Sir John Moring.

JÁN BARRÓ DEL ÁR

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.